Why Every Plaintiff Must Understand This Rule Before Filing a Claim

Zukowski v Jean

Pennsylvania law requires plaintiffs bringing medical malpractice claims to file a certificate of merit within 60 days of their complaint. Without this document—signed by a qualified medical expert confirming that the case has merit—the court can dismiss the lawsuit entirely.

That is exactly what happened in Zukowski v. Jean, where a pro se plaintiff alleged that a neurosurgeon used an improper material during his surgery, leading to hearing loss, balance issues, and cognitive problems. Although he filed suit, he never submitted a certificate of merit, never attached a supporting expert statement, and never requested an extension of time under Rule 1042.3(d).

Despite arguing that he needed medical records and disability accommodations, the court held that:

  • Discovery is not permitted until a certificate of merit is filed
  • Pro se litigants must follow the same rules as attorneys
  • The plaintiff failed to use the “one and only” procedural mechanism—timely seeking an extension

The Superior Court affirmed the dismissal.

The Bottom Line for Malpractice Victims

Medical negligence cases in Pennsylvania rise and fall on expert testimony. Without early expert involvement, a malpractice case cannot move forward—even when injuries are severe. Filing without the proper expert support can permanently damage or destroy a claim.

Thinking About Filing a Medical Malpractice Case? Call Us Before You File.

At Medina | Morgan, our Philadelphia medical malpractice lawyers know how to navigate Pennsylvania’s strict certificate-of-merit rules. We work closely with top medical experts to evaluate claims quickly, preserve your rights, and build strong cases from day one.

Before you file anything, schedule a free consultation with Medina | Morgan.
We’ll review your records, connect you with the right experts, and guide you through every step of the process.